BETWEEN IS AND OUGHT: AT THE ROOTS OF REGULATORY OBLIGATORINESS
HUMANITIES AND RIGHTS GLOBAL NETWORK JOURNAL
Endereço:
Avenida Rui Barbosa - 1426 - Graças
Recife / PE
52050-000
Site: http://www.humanitiesandrights.com
Telefone: (81) 3426-5026
ISSN: 2576-1038
Editor Chefe: Claudio Brandao
Início Publicação: 31/12/2019
Periodicidade: Semestral
Área de Estudo: Multidisciplinar
BETWEEN IS AND OUGHT: AT THE ROOTS OF REGULATORY OBLIGATORINESS
Ano: 2019 | Volume: 1 | Número: 1
Autores: Agata Amato Mangiameli
Autor Correspondente: Agata Amato Mangiameli | [email protected]
Autor Correspondente: Agata Amato Mangiameli | [email protected]
Palavras-chave: roots of law, facts and values, truth, certainty of law, justice, com-possibility
Resumos Cadastrados
Resumo Inglês:
Facts and values, truth and values. These are the terms that are the premise of this analysis. The aim is to ask oneself about Law and its foundation. In particular, two different questions require a new and more updated discussion: one is dedicated mainly to what the Law prescribes in a certain place and at a certain time (quid iuris) (Science of Law), and the other, instead, concerns above all justice (quid ius) (Philosophy of Law). It is only from the tension between Law and Justice that the jurist can be reconciled with jurisprudence and fulfill what – in hindsight – is his fundamental task: setting checks and balances to legislation for the protection of human rights.
