Este artigo representa uma analise comparativa entre as epistemologias
cientificas de dois autores fundamentais para a filosofia da ciencia do
seculo 20, Gaston Bachelard e Karl Popper. Como se vera, existem pontos
de contacto entre as posicoes apresentadas, mas tambem divergencias fundamentais
que nos ajudam a compreender mais pormerorizadamente aquilo
a que a tradicao anglo-saxonica costuma chamar de modelos de pratica cientifica.
This article is a comparative analysis between the scientific epistemologies
of two authors who are fundamental in twentieth-century philosophy
of science, Gaston Bachelard and Karl Popper. As it will be seen, there
are points of contact between the positions here presented. But thare are also
fundamental dibergencies which help us understand in better detail that
which the Anglo-Saxon tradition usually calls models of “scientific practiceâ€.
