This article reviews the neurosecurity as an emerging trend in international law. Particular attention is paid to the necessity of international legal regulation for new categories of human rights such as neurorights. The author considers the importance of legally formalize such terms as “neuroright”, “cognitive freedom”, “neurohacking”, “neurodopping”, “neurocide”, human brain transplants”, etc., as well as the terms “neuroculture”, “cognitive freedom”, “neurodoping”, “brain implant transplants”, etc. The research uses general scientific and special cognitive techniques wherein legal analysis and synthesis, systemic, formal-legal, comparative-legal, historicallegal and dialectical methods are applied.