COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODELS CALPUFF AND LAGRANGIAN LAMBDA WITH LINE SOURCE

Ciência E Natura

Endereço:
Revista Ciência e Natura | Campus Sede-Cidade Universitária | Av. Roraima nº 1000, Prédio 13, Sala 1122 | Fone/Fax +55(55) 3220-8735 | Bairro Camobi
Santa Maria / RS
97105-900
Site: http://www.ufsm.br/cienciaenatura
Telefone: (55) 3220-8735
ISSN: 2179-460X
Editor Chefe: Marcelo Barcellos da Rosa
Início Publicação: 30/11/1979
Periodicidade: Quadrimestral

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODELS CALPUFF AND LAGRANGIAN LAMBDA WITH LINE SOURCE

Ano: 2016 | Volume: 38 | Número: Especial
Autores: Franco Caldas Degrazia, Marco Túllio Menna Barreto de Vilhena, Gervásio Annes Degrazia, Bardo Bodmann
Autor Correspondente: Franco Caldas Degrazia | [email protected]

Palavras-chave: calufff, regulatory model, lamda, neutral boundary layer, lline source instantaneous emission

Resumos Cadastrados

Resumo Inglês:

The aim of this study is to compare the CALPUFF and LAMBDA models and evaluate the regulatory model CALPUFF accuracy in situations of line instant source emissions. Line source emissions exist in a variety of situations in the environmental field. Paved and unpaved roads are the most common examples of line sources. For instance, in the mining sector these two types of sources play an important role of anthropogenic influences in the environment. The OLAD experiment is appropriate to evaluate these models and check the accuracy of both. The CALPUFF results show in the simulations for short and long distances a systematic tendency of sub-prediction for the concentration. The LAMBDA model presented better accuracy in the prediction of natural pollutant dispersion even disregarding the spatial variability of meteorological field and topography. When the LAMBDA model is used the flow of pollutants to greater distances is less pronounced, especially because of the time step of one second adopted in the simulation.