The Photon is Naked: The Role of Textbook in the Building of a Common World

Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências

Endereço:
Avenida Presidente Vargas, 633 - sala 1501 - Centro
Rio de Janeiro / RJ
20071004
Site: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbpec/index
Telefone: (84) 9998-7617
ISSN: 1984-2686
Editor Chefe: Aline Nicolli, Marcia Gorette Lima da Silva, Silvania Souza do Nascimento, Suzani Cassiani
Início Publicação: 01/01/2001
Periodicidade: Anual
Área de Estudo: Multidisciplinar, Área de Estudo: Multidisciplinar

The Photon is Naked: The Role of Textbook in the Building of a Common World

Ano: 2024 | Volume: 24 | Número: Não se aplica
Autores: P. A. V. Vazata, P. M. Trein, N. W. Lima, F. Ostermann
Autor Correspondente: P. M. Trein | [email protected]

Palavras-chave: Quantum Physics, textbooks, discourse analysis

Resumos Cadastrados

Resumo Inglês:

Given the ontological plurality associated with Quantum Theory (i.e., the multiplicity of interpretations of the theory), we investigated the approaches of 22 undergraduate textbooks in the process of composing a possible common world about electromagnetic radiation. In the work, we align ourselves, on the one hand, with the proposals of Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Bruno Latour and Isabelle Stengers, arguing that reality occurs through a cosmopolitical process in which non-transcendental multinatures negotiate to achieve common stabilization. These perspectives collide with a central metaphysics of modernism: a reality grounded in a unique and innate nature (called cosmopolitan). On the other hand, we started from Bakhtin’s Philosophy of Language to analyze the style of speech cited in the books. The main analysis of the text is to identify whether the books are cosmopolitan or cosmopolitical, and whether the boundaries of the cited discourse are explicit or erased. The results found in our analysis indicate that there is no ontologically stabilized electromagnetic radiation proposition when we consider all textbooks. However, as most of these same books hide the limits between propositions, it is evident that the authors simulate that there is a consensus in the scientific community regarding their ontology.