USES, REUSES AND ABUSES: CROSSING “BORDERS” AND “LUSO-AFRICANITIES” IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHIES OF ANGOLA, CAPE VERDE AND GUINEA-BISSAU FOR THE 15TH, 16TH AND 17TH CENTURIES

Revista Brasileira de Estudos Africanos

Endereço:
UFRGS - Faculdade de Ciências EconômicasAv. João Pessoa, 52 sala 33A - 3° andar - Centro - Porto Alegre/RS
Porto Alegre / RS
90040-000
Site: http://www.seer.ufrgs.br/rbea
Telefone: (51) 3308-3963
ISSN: 24483907
Editor Chefe: Analúcia Danilevicz Pereira
Início Publicação: 31/05/2016
Periodicidade: Bianual
Área de Estudo: Ciências Humanas, Área de Estudo: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Área de Estudo: Multidisciplinar

USES, REUSES AND ABUSES: CROSSING “BORDERS” AND “LUSO-AFRICANITIES” IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHIES OF ANGOLA, CAPE VERDE AND GUINEA-BISSAU FOR THE 15TH, 16TH AND 17TH CENTURIES

Ano: 2019 | Volume: 4 | Número: 8
Autores: Alec Ichiro Ito
Autor Correspondente: Alec Ichiro Ito | [email protected]

Palavras-chave: History of Angola; History of Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau; Borders and identities

Resumos Cadastrados

Resumo Inglês:

This article develops the notions of “frontier” and “Luso-Africanity”, addressing some cases anchored in the writing of the history of Angola, Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau for the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries. The guiding thread of this narrative is the sharing and circularity of these notions, split into two moments. In the first, we will understand the notion of the Africanist frontier, as it affects the studies developed by North-American historiography since the postwar period. In a second moment, we will introduce some notions of “Luso-Africanity”, drawing attention to the focus given to multiple identity practices. At the end of this article, we will point out some of the risks and obstacles that permeate the notion of Luso-Africanity, the main one being the dissolution of the differences, asymmetries and inequalities that have crossed the Euro-African contacts. As a working hypothesis, we assume that future researches will carry out more empirical investigations, as well as support a more critical stance on cultural hybridism, blood miscegenation, multiple identities, religious syncretism and peaceful social fusion.